Search for: "Limited Clothing Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2018, 2:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, June 29, 2018, Pinkette Clothing, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:47 am
The recently-released case In re Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
Josephs Licensing Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:16 am
Unlike the Patent Act and the Copyright Act, the Lanham Act has no statute of limitations and expressly makes laches a defense to cancellation (Pinkette Clothing, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 10:29 am
Because an article of clothing is useful, many courts have limited copyright protection for clothing to elements such as fabric prints. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:57 am
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:45 am
In re Mutyaar Inc., Serial No. 86345866 (February 17, 2016) [not precedential].The Marks: The Board concluded that the marks sound the same and have similar appearances. [read post]
31 May 2018, 1:35 pm
Industrie IP Party, Limited, the Applicant sought to register the design mark FINEST QUALITY GARMENT MAKERS INDUSTRIE TURN OF THE CENTURY CLOTHING EST 1999 for clothing. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:09 am
Kenneth Cole Productions (LIC) Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 4:25 am
GTFM, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
"Noting that any doubts on mere descriptiveness are to be resolved in favor of Applicant, the Board reversed the refusal.TTABlog comment: One thing that troubles me about this decision is the fact that Applicant's goods are not limited to "environmentally-aware" clothing. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 2:45 am
See In re Strategic Partners, Inc., 102 USPQ2d 1397 (TTAB 2012) [precedential]. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 2:00 am
Previously, employers enjoyed substantial discretion to limit alterations to work uniforms or other designated clothing in the workplace. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
Due to this split in authority, the Supreme Court agreed to resolve the limited question of “the meaning of the phrase “changing clothes” as it appears in the Fair Labor Standards Act…. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
The answer is 'yes', according to the ruling passed down at the beginning of November by His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) in Bentley 1962 Limited and Brandlogic Limited v Bentley Motors Limited [2019] EWHC 2925 (Ch). [read post]
Citable No. 51: TTAB Upholds 2(d) Refusal of "PSYCHO" for Clothing, But Overturns Mutilation Refusal
6 Dec 2006, 5:11 pm
" In re Big Pig, Inc., Serial No. 78249582 (November 16, 2006).Applicant's specimen of useLikelihood of confusion: Applicant Big Pig, Inc. trotted out what may be the losingest TTAB argument: it attempted to limit the goods of its application and the cited registration by referring to the actual channels of trade and manner of use of the marks. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 7:10 pm
The Wet Seal, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 5:28 am
” (Channel Fabrics, Inc. v Skwiersky, Alpert & Bressler LLP, 2022 NY Misc LEXIS 8980, *4 [Sup Ct, NY County 2022] [citation omitted].) [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
Due to this split in authority, the Supreme Court agreed to resolve the limited question of “the meaning of the phrase “changing clothes” as it appears in the Fair Labor Standards Act…. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 3:03 am
Detroit Tigers, Inc. v. [read post]
